Satan’s
“Plan” in Cardston
Over the Labor Day weekend there has been a fascinating development in
the peaceful Southern Alberta town of Cardston that would peak the interest of
both political economists and Christian theologians alike. Cardston, a town founded by early members of The
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, more commonly known as the Mormons,
is considering a plebiscite to poll the local citizens regarding issues such as
prohibition and opening public recreational facilities to organized sports on
Sunday.
Mormons Fighting
Amidst all the recent political discussion surrounding the upcoming
plebiscite, it would seem that there are two groups of faithful Mormons
fighting against each other on Cardston related blogs and social media sites. Interestingly each group seems to believe that
the other group is being subtly deceived by Satan and are unknowingly
supporting Satan’s “plan” as outlined in the war in heaven before the creation
of the earth. It leaves one to wonder how
people who attend the same Sunday school classes and follow the same Priesthood
leadership could so fundamentally disagree about the basic tenets of their
faith.
Satan’s Force Plan
One group believes that in the Grand Council of Heaven, Satan proposed
to end the agency of man by removing individual freedom and forcing every human
soul to be righteous, effectively saving everyone since no unclean thing can
dwell in heaven. In their view, any law
that places restrictions on things that Mormons consider sin is an attempt to
force people to be righteous and is therefore a political reproduction of Satan’s
historical plan. This group believes
that anyone who would support a law that limits the choices (agency) of others
has been deceived by Satan and is unknowingly doing his bidding.
Satan’s Freedom Plan
The second group agrees that Satan‘s plan was, and still is, to end the
agency of man, but they differ in how they believe Satan would accomplish
this. Rather than forcing everyone to be
righteous, they believe Satan was proposing that there be an absence of laws
and therefore mankind would be free from the consequences of breaking them. No laws = No judgment. Since you can’t break laws when there are
none, no one would become unclean and therefore no one would lose their place
in heaven. They believe Satan’s plan was
very persuasive because it had the appearance of unhindered freedom with no
risk, where, in contrast, God’s plan was all about obedience and sacrifice with
the possibility of failure. This second
group believes that anyone trying to remove all laws in the name of freedom is
unknowingly fighting Satan’s battle for him ultimately leading to more people
sinning which, in their opinion, is all Satan cares about.
Anarchy, Tyranny or ???
Sadly, neither the Bible nor the additional Mormon scriptures specify
which of these approaches is actually Satan’s plan. Obviously, neither of the two groups is eager
to admit that they are the ones being deceived and are unwittingly working for
the Master of Deception. Assuming both
groups agree that neither anarchy nor tyranny are desirable alternatives,
perhaps they should spend more time and energy trying to figure out where the legal
balance of a healthy democracy is and what makes a law good or bad for society. If they could come to some kind of consensus
on what sort of community they would all like to have, it is likely that their
policy making decisions would be much less obfuscated.
At any rate, if these Mormons can’t figure out Satan’s entire long-term
plan for Cardston, perhaps they should simply ask themselves, “How Would Satan
Vote?” for each plebiscite question. No matter what the outcome of this
plebiscite will be, one thing is certain; a house divided against itself cannot
stand.